neo compares what a role needs with evidence from a candidate’s real projects.

For hiring managers and for people describing their own work. Each side talks it through with an AI interviewer, then checks the draft. No scores, no rankings.

Both sign in with a one-time code sent to their email. Privacy

Browse example roles

Worked example · fictional people and company

Evidence review: Alex Morgan

Against Senior Backend Engineer, Payments Reliability · Tallyhouse

Alex's projects show direct work on two of the role's core problems: duplicate payouts and queue lag at peak load. Three requirements are supported with quotes. Postgres scale and mentoring aren't covered by any project yet. Alex's stated view on on-call differs from the role's one-week-in-six rotation.

Evidence supports · 3Still unclear · 2Discuss a difference · 1
RequirementStatusWhat the projects show

Designing idempotent APIs for money movement

Evidence supports

“I designed client-supplied idempotency keys, wrote the migration for two years of payout records and rolled it out behind a flag. Duplicates went to zero the next quarter.”

Self-reportedPayout retries at Fernway

Debugging distributed queues in production

Evidence supports

Found and fixed a hot-partition lag during peak load.

Postgres performance on very large tables

Still unclear

Ask: What's the largest Postgres table you've tuned, and what changed?

Writing incident reviews that change practice

Evidence supports

Wrote a review whose actions became team defaults.

Mentoring mid-level engineers

Still unclear

Ask: Tell me about someone you helped grow. What changed for them?

Owning on-call for a payments service

Discuss a difference

Alex prefers to avoid on-call; the role includes one week in six.

4 questions for the conversation · practical fit includedOpen the full example
Browse example roles